Google Rejects DOJ’s Plan to Sell Chrome

Alphabet Inc.’s Google has strongly opposed the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) recommendation to sell its Chrome web browser. Calling the proposed remedy “extreme” and “misaligned” with the alleged antitrust violations, Google has urged caution to avoid stifling innovation and future investment.

DOJ’s Remedies to Address Antitrust Concerns

The DOJ, backed by several states, has suggested sweeping changes to Google’s business practices. These include the sale of Chrome and adjustments to Google’s agreements with device manufacturers and browser providers. The goal is to improve competition in the online search market, where Google holds significant dominance.

Google’s Alternative Proposal for Compliance

Google proposed its own remedy, emphasizing flexibility for competing browsers and device makers. The company’s plan includes:

• Allowing browsers like Apple’s Safari to independently negotiate deals with search engines.
• Permitting device manufacturers to preload multiple search engines.
• Removing the requirement to include Chrome or Google Search with other Google apps.

Court Precedents Discourage Extreme Measures

Google argues that extreme measures like selling Chrome deviate from established legal principles. According to the company, remedies should align with the specific antitrust violations found by the court. The DOJ’s broader request risks penalizing Google for unrelated innovations, such as advancements in AI or web crawling technologies.

Implications for the Search and Advertising Markets

The legal battle stems from accusations that Google’s exclusive agreements with browsers and device manufacturers unfairly restricted competition. While Judge Amit Mehta ruled Google had monopolized online search and advertising markets, the company plans to appeal once the case concludes.

Google’s Commitment to Fair Competition

Google has emphasized its willingness to address antitrust concerns without compromising its ability to innovate. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president for regulatory affairs, outlined the company’s proposal to balance competition and consumer choice while allowing rivals to thrive.

Next Steps in the Legal Battle

Judge Mehta has scheduled proceedings in April 2025 to determine how to address competition issues. A final decision is expected by August 2025. In the meantime, Google aims to demonstrate that its proposed remedies can effectively enhance competition without dismantling its core business operations.

The Broader Impact of DOJ’s Proposed Changes

Google’s opposition highlights the broader implications of antitrust remedies for tech giants. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, balancing competitive fairness with the freedom to innovate remains a critical challenge for policymakers and industry leaders.